|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By R. Braybrook, T. Gander & A. Preston |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Depending
on the service that uses them - Aviation, Army or Navy - pyrotechnics
can be used to fulfil a variety of requirements. Generally used to conceal,
they can also be used for quite opposite purposes, like illuminating a
battlefield.
Off-board decoys for aircraft were introduced by Britain in the form
of anti-radar chaff in 1943, and as infrared flares by America around
1970. These low-cost expendables are still in use today, but work continues
to make them even more effective.
In the 1991 Gulf War at least 15 Coalition aircraft were downed by man-portable infrared-guided missiles. This followed heavy Soviet losses to similar weapons in Afghanistan, by the end of which the Su-25 had been given eight 32-round flare-dispensers, sufficient for eight passes.
BAE Systems' Integrated Defense Solutions (formerly Tracor) claims to
be the foremost developer and producer of aircraft flares. Like the company's
chaff products, these are ejected from IDS' own dispensing systems, such
as the Ale-40 and -45. The Ale-47 is described as the most advanced of
countermeasures-dispenser systems (CMDS), with over 2500 installed in
the aircraft of 20 nations.
Advances in infrared missile seekers are expected to lead to the aircraft
defending itself with a combination of flares, probably in the form of
a traditional burning free-fall flare, a rocket-powered kinematic flare
such as the BAE Systems MJU-47/B or -48/B to fly ahead of the aircraft,
and a third that is spectrally-matched to aircraft type. The MJU-48/B
ejects non-burning pyrophoric wafers, which heat up when in contact with
oxygen. The pyrophoric process was patented by Alloy Surfaces, which makes
the MJU-27/B flare for US Navy applications, the -50/B for transports
and helicopters and the -51/B for fighters.
Work by Canada's Defence Research Establishment Valcartier has led to
the development of flares using pyrophoric liquids to defeat spectrally-discriminating
two-colour missile seekers. The MJU-5188/B flare was developed for the
CF-18 Hornet, and the MJU-5130/B for the CC-130 Hercules. Flight trials
began in 1996, and a production order is expected to be signed shortly.
The flare is ejected from the dispenser by a squib, but its base is retained
and remains connected to the flare by a wire. When this wire becomes taut,
it ignites a gas generator in the flare, moving a piston that expels the
pyrophoric liquid through a nozzle, to ignite spontaneously on contact
with the air. The prime contractor is Bristol Aerospace and its principal
subcontractor is SNC Technologies.
To defeat surveillance radars, chaff can be employed to provide a safe
corridor for following aircraft, and to create false targets that confuse
ground defence systems. As a self-protection device against surface-based
and missile-mounted tracking radars, chaff is best used in conjunction
with an evasive manoeuvre.
Land forces utilise pyrotechnics for many reasons. Leaving aside the use of smoke for screening or concealment purposes, the main tactical applications for them are attracting attention and illumination. Pyrotechnics are therefore rarely deployed as active weapons but as support devices, indicating locations of tactical importance or enabling weapon operatives to observe targets at night.
Pyrotechnic attention attraction devices are several in character. They vary from coloured smokes to 'sentry' devices that indicate intrusions by bang/flash results following the activation of a tripwire or some other triggering method. Included in the range are coloured smokes for signalling and simple flares that can be used as individual or unit location indicators, or as tactical warning or emergency signals. Any nation with the capability to manufacture display fireworks can produce such military pyrotechnics. The techniques involved are not so incredibly advanced, as they date back to before the introduction of black powder-based explosives during the Middle Ages, so pyrotechnics rarely change much in design or display any great technological innovations. Firework-based pyrotechics, such as Thunderflashes, remain among the most widely-employed of all military stores, with applications from tactical training to creating distractions during combat.
Smoke generation devices come in several forms, varying from the so-called
smoke pots to grenades. The traditional use of smoke has always been to
screen activity from enemy vision but by introducing coloured smokes it
becomes possible to employ smoke to denote target or unit locations, indicate
para-drop or landing zones and to deliver simple signals. Most coloured
smoke grenades differ little from conventional smoke grenades, having
some mixture of smoke-producing compound held within a 'beer can' canister
to be activated by a simple mousetrap ignition device as it is thrown.
After a delay of a few seconds most hand grenades will emit coloured smoke
for almost a minute and a half.
Mentions of flares introduces visions of Very pistols firing signal
flares for any number of reasons, from distress situations to delivering
fire orders or attack warnings, the latter including chemical agent attack.
Other flare delivery methods include the little hand-held 'fountain pen'
launchers, and friction-ignited tubes propelling the flares using a small
explosive charge or rocket motor.
Several of these latter concerns also produce miniature 'fountain pen'
launchers and flares on which a hand-held, spring-loaded launcher fires
a small flare body from a cup at one end. The flare bodies have calibres
of about 16 mm so are limited in height and burn time performance. They
are gradually being replaced by miniature flare kits in which the flare
bodies are held in a loading block or body that may, in some cases, be
converted to become a launcher. A typical example of the latter is the
Nicosignal flare kit from Nico Pyrotechnik on which revolving magazines
holding six flares can be attached to a hand-held launcher. The Pains-Wessex
Miniflare kit involves a carrying block containing eight screw-on cartridges
that are inserted into a small launcher tube cup prior to use (it is to
be noted that Pains Wessex, Schermuly and Haley & Weller have recently
joined forces and formed a new company called PW Defence).
Sentry or alarm flares follow a general pattern of a canister secured to a stake, tree or structure. A trigger mechanism on the canister is actuated via a tripwire or pressure pad so when an intruder activates the device a loud aural report is produced, sufficient to wake even the sleepiest guard, and the immediate area is rapidly illuminated by a bright flare. Further flares may be launched skywards to emphasise the point of intrusion even further.
For many countries, the US M49A1 surface trip flare acts as the prototype. In production by ATK, the M49A1 is issued as a kit complete with the flare canister, a mounting bracket and a 15 metre coil of tripwire; for some applications a metal picket is available. The bracket enables the flare body to be secured to a stake or structure and the trigger mechanism may be activated by the tripwire being either pulled or severed. The M49A1 is copied direct in Iran and South Korea (by the Hanwha Corporation), while essentially similar devices are offered by Haley and Weller (the E190) and Pains-Wessex (the A603) of Britain, Nico Pyrotechnic of Germany and Chartered Pyrotechnic Industries of Singapore. Many other nations produce similar devices.
The naval use of pyrotechnics was at one time confined to target-illumination and camouflage (smoke screens), but the advent of the heat-seeking missile changed all that forever. Today pyrotechnics in the form of infrared (IR) decoy flares are an essential element of self-protection systems, and the only debate is over means of deploying such decoys. Another irreversible change is to integrate such systems into the ship's combat management system.
The French Navy uses the Système d'Autodefense pour la Guerre Infrarouge et Electromagnétique (Sagaie) AMBL-2A as a long-range decoy-launcher capable of firing parachute-suspended sub-munitions. It equips the CVN Charles de Gaulle, the Cassard class DDGs and the Italian Maestrale class frigates, among others. It complements the shorter-range Dagaie Mk 2 AMBL-1B system, which is suitable for smaller warships. Decoy rounds are contained in 34-round Type C 'suitcases', and a delayed-action mechanism ensures that the cloud is co-located with the chaff cloud. Each IR decoy burns for 30 seconds, the emitting surface covering 360 metres2 at an altitude of 15 metres. The German Buck Neue Technologien Giant IR seduction round has been adopted by the US Navy (as Mk 245), the Royal Navy and six others. Each sub-munition contains a three-part pyrotechnic payload: a mixture of warm smoke (for 8 to 14 microns), glowing particles (for 3 to 5 microns) and gaseous radiation (for 4.1 to 4.5 microns). Buck claims that these rounds are effective against scanning and imaging seekers, including two-colour types. All front-line navies fear the 'beaconing' effect of on-board decoys, whether chaff or infrared flares. The Royal Australian Navy took the lead some years ago with the Nulka, an offboard delivery system using the Winnin hovering rocket. The purpose of the hovering rocket is to generate a cloud of decoys moving at a sufficiently slow rate to simulate the target-ship, and once that is achieved, the payload can be varied to suit tactical requirements. The US Navy liked it sufficiently enough to develop it as the Mk 234 system for amphibious ships. The Sea Gnat is a Nato collaborative programme based on the US Navy's Super Rapid Blooming Offboard Chaff (SRBoc) launcher. Its Mk 218 infrared decoy round was abandoned and later replaced by the Giant. As an interim measure Wallop Industries' Barricade system was shipped, as it offered the only defence against heat-seeking missiles at the time. The Royal Navy designates Sea Gnat DLB and DLJ, and has apparently ordered an infrared flare round from Chemring, the well-known supplier of payloads. Its offboard solution is BAE Systems' Siren (DLH), which fires a parachute-suspended round. The round activates itself 10 seconds after launch at a pre-set range of 400 to 500 metres. The manufacturers of the French Mistral heat-seeking missile claim that it can 'see' through decoy flares, but the new Chemring round is understood to be opaque to the Mistral seeker. This would require a much more sophisticated pyrotechnic round than anything known to exist previously. It may be no more than a coincidence, but Chemring has just bought the American flare-manufacturer Kilgore from Alliant Techsystems. Tracor (purchased last year by BAE Systems) makes a Shipboard Countermeasures Interface Package (SCIP) for Mk 33 and Mk 36 launchers for export, handling both 113 mm and 130 mm cartridges. The 130 mm Tactical Distraction IR (TDIR-130) round is its main pyrotechnic product, but it also makes 66 mm and 76 mm smoke/obscurant grenade-launchers. The US Navy also uses the SRBOC Super Gemini combined radio-frequency/IR round, and the Mk 186 Torch IR decoy, which continues to burn after landing on water. There is also an Advanced Torch Decoy (Mod 3), but this is likely to be superseded by the Mk 245 Giant. With the end of the Cold War and the upsurge in sales of ships and equipment to export customers, we now know more about Russian flare decoy systems. The PK-2 (Zif-121) trainable 152 mm twin-tube launcher is assumed to be capable of launching an IR decoy round, as well as a 140 mm TST-47 IR decoy, weighing 38.5 kg at 1.1 metres long. The PK-2 is the oldest decoy-launcher in Russian service, and was for many years the only such system fitted. The PK-10 is a lightweight 10-tube 120 mm barrage decoy-launcher designed for the Udaloy class destroyers. It fires the SOM-50 flare and aerosol IR decoy, the SK-50 combined chaff/IR decoy round, and an infrared/laser/optical decoy is said to be under development. PK-16 is an East German-designed launcher using sixteen 82 mm tubes. Its 653 mm long TST-60U IR decoy round weighs 8.5 kg. As the virtual inventors of soft-kill systems capable of defeating anti-ship missiles, the Israelis have a considerable reputation. In addition to trainable launchers, the majority of Israeli Navy fast attack craft have twin tubes flanking the bridge, firing smoke rounds to defeat electro-optically guided weapons. As knowledge of decoy systems proliferates, many of the smaller navies continue to develop indigenous systems to generate local expertise, but in most cases they rely on the well-established manufacturers to supply the payload. Japan's Maritime Self Defence Force (MSDF), the Republic of China Navy and the Republic of Korea Navy, for example, rely heavily on American expendables. The Royal Swedish Navy uses the CelsiusTech Philax launching system (also produced by the former MEL company in Britain as Protean). The Philax 106 has an IR decoy capability. The first five IR grenades are fired at a range of about 10 metres, then two groups of eight are deployed by parachute, merging with the chaff cloud at an altitude of about 10-15 metres above the sea. Reaction time is about two seconds, resulting in an IR target of about 150 metres in length. The 4.5 kg IR payload burns for about 25 seconds, working in the 3 to 5 and 8 to 14 micron bands. The Bofors division of CelsiusTech also makes 57 mm and 103 mm IR decoy rockets, for launching from rails on the sides of gunshields or stand-alone launchers. The former are launched on command from the fire control system, the latter are linked to the ship's electronic warfare system. Space does not permit more than a passing reference to air-launched IR flares, mainly by land-based and shipborne helicopters. These are, in virtually all cases, merely the naval equivalent of airborne systems used by air forces. Shipboard helicopters are also equipped with more conventional illuminant flares for such operations as search-and-rescue (Sar). Submarines have used smoke candles for many decades, as a simple method of revealing their presence during joint exercises, and today they still rely on pyrotechnics for smoke signals, either as a distress call in case of a serious accident or as a simple method of communicating with surface warships. Modern signal-ejectors can select colours for a pre-arranged coding system. Flare decoys are developing rapidly, to match improvements in heat-seeking missiles. The solution must now be tailored exactly to the expected threat, which causes a headache for the US Navy and its allies. Today's enthusiasm for peacekeeping and intervention in local wars means that ships can be attacked by a variety of threats, emanating from more than one country's inventory. To react to such a spread of weapons the defending navy must have a full range of capabilities. No wonder that Western commanders are sometimes nostalgic for the certainties of the Cold War. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||